Personal tools
Disability Rights Connection

2012 Legislative Session: Bills of Interest to the Disability Community ...more

PORTLAND, ORE. – Jan. 25, 2012 – Advocates for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities today filed a class action lawsuit challenging Oregon’s failure to provide supported employment services to more than 2,300 state residents who are segregated in sheltered workshops where they perform mundane tasks, such as folding UPS bags. ...more

Michelle Cole, The Oregonian | The United Cerebral Palsy Association of Oregon and Southwest Washington along with eight individuals representing thousands of Oregonians with intellectual or physical disabilities filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday against Gov. John Kitzhaber and top managers at the Department of Human Services. Advocates hope the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Portland, will set a national precedent and end the practice of having people with disabilities to spend their days in "sheltered workshops," where they complete repetitive or rote tasks for a sub-minimum wage and without the opportunity for training or advancement. ...more

On September 28, 2011, the U.S. Department of Education issued new regulations for Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). These new regulations, now in effect, specify requirements for early intervention (EI) services for children with disabilities under the age of three years and include requirements for the transition of these children to early childhood special education services (ECSE) under IDEA Part B. The Oregon Department of Education (ODE) has proposed new and revised Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) to align with these IDEA changes. ...more

Donate Now

Make a Donation to Support DRO's Work

Our ability to advocate for individuals and to bring about long-term improvements depends on support from people who care about disability rights.
 

Service dogs for autistic kids | By The Oregonian Editorial Board

Oregon schools must tread carefully to avoid unintended harm, but they should try to accommodate and welcome disabled children with trained service animals

January 12, 2010, 12:20AM

dog.jpg
Madison is a service animal for a Hillsboro boy with autism.


Click here to read this editorial at oregonlive.com


No cure exists yet for autism. No sure-fire treatment, either. Oregon parents of children with autism must instead scour the earth for the right medicine, the right diet, the right behavioral therapy that might help their child thrive in school with other kids.

If a highly trained dog can help, Oregon school districts should let families try. Though state and federal disability laws regarding service animals are murky and inadequate, the ethical obligation to work with disabled children and their families remains.

The Hillsboro School District finds itself in conflict with a family wanting an autistic son to bring his trained service dog to school, as The Oregonian's Wendy Owen reported Monday. The school district says no, arguing that the 9-year-old boy does well enough without the dog. The district now faces a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Justice by Disability Rights Oregon on behalf of the family.

The district may have good reason to say no. It's hard for outsiders to know, given the confidentiality issues involved and the complexity of disability law. However, it's clear from this case that Hillsboro and other Oregon school districts need to review their policies about service animals and ask a few questions. For starters:

How should schools define service animals or therapy animals? What kind of certification or training do these animals need to be considered safe in a school setting? Under what circumstances should a district say no to a family? Should behavioral disorders or mental illnesses be treated differently from physical disabilities?

These questions are not hypothetical. They're being hashed out in school districts and courtrooms across the country.

Last fall, for example, a New York mother sued the local school district for refusing to allow her son to bring his 5-month-old Labrador puppy to school. (The mother said the puppy helped her severely diabetic son monitor his glucose levels. The district said the dog was too young to be trained at much of anything.) Families have sued districts in Illinois, California and Pennsylvania.

In the Hillsboro case, the boy in question has autism severe enough to trigger frequent outbursts and meltdowns. The dog, a German shepherd, helps the boy calm down and keeps him from bolting. The family purchased the dog from an Ohio-based nonprofit that specializes in training dogs for people with disabilities. The nonprofit's founder says the dog got 500 hours of specialized training.

Yes, school districts need strict policies in place so that families can't abuse the system and classrooms don't become menageries. But when a highly trained dog can help an autistic boy learn more and disrupt other students less, you'd think school officials would grab the dog biscuits rather than call the lawyers.

Document Actions
  • < a href="" tal:attributes="href daction/url; title daction/description"> < img tal:attributes="alt daction/title; title daction/title; src daction/icon;" /> < /a>
  • < a href="" tal:attributes="href daction/url; title daction/description"> < img tal:attributes="alt daction/title; title daction/title; src daction/icon;" /> < /a>